The Punishment by Means of Death Sentence Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

The Punishment by Means of Death Sentence - Essay ExampleCertain cultures and societies hold against it and others support it. In this paper we will be discussing that capital punishment is an respectable and moral federal agency of punishing various(prenominal)s who indulge in wrong doings. To support this flock, the argument will be backed with the ethical theory of Utilitarianism and Kants Categorical Imperative. Discussion According to the Utilitarian perspective, actions should be considered as right or wrong on the basis of utility or benefits and monetary values those actions have to offer to the familiarity (MacKinnon, 2009, p.38) . The view even suggests that those actions should be selected which have higher(prenominal) utility than cost for the society, as compared to any other actions that sens be conducted. Death punishment, offers more benefits than costs to the society, therefore, it is considered as a morally and ethically correct action. The assorted benefits of death punishment include death penalty is considered as a very harsh punishment, stack panic death. This fear of death may stimulate other fells from committing crimes in the time to come. Therefore, death objurgate inflicts fear of death in criminals, and due to this fear, criminals might avoid committing future crimes. A nonher benefit of death penalty is that those criminals who are currently conducting crimes and will possibly commit future crimes will be removed from the society and the number of criminals currently existing in the system will decrease. Another advantage of the death sentence is the satisfaction that the society as well as the victims family receives from knowing that justice has been served, and the criminal has faced equal consequences and pain that the victim faced. Those who are not in the favor of death penalty argue that due to death penalty, those individuals have to experience death that might have not in reality perpetrate the crime and have been held responsible. Some contradictors of death penalty even state that there is no pure research stating that death penalty has really stopped criminals from committing crime and has stopped potential criminals from conducting future crimes. Contradictors argue that the level of suffering in case of death penalty is less than the suffering go through in life imprisonment, thus life imprisonment should be considered as a better alternative than death penalty. Those who are not in the favor of death penalty even state that the monetary cost bared by the government for conducting a case of death penalty is higher than the cost of any other form of trial, thus the society ends up paying in the form of higher taxes. According to retributive justice, those individuals who have committed wrong, should pay the cost of their actions and should be held responsible (Hinman, 2009, p.245). Kant supports this view Kant believes that comparison and justice can only be served if a wrong doe r is treated in ossification to his wrong doings. Kant supports the idea that an individual should be treated the same way he has treated others. This does not mean that a murderer should be murdered in the same way he has committed the murder. However, the murder should experience equal pain as the pain felt by the victim who was murdered. Secondly, Kant states that an individual should treat others in a particular way, if he/she is ready to accept the same treatment (Pojman, 2009, p.129).